The caption claims it is 'Sarah Brown, a popular music hall dancer’ who was jailed for three months for indecency just for wearing this costume.
So
who was Sarah Brown? Hardly anybody knows her name today. I assumed she was a
forgotten figure who scraped a living in the seedy backwaters of London ’s theatre land.
But, after an hour of eye-wearying Googling, it emerged that the real Sarah
Brown was probably THE most famous model of her day (the early 1890s). And she
was French.
Marie
Royer (if that really was her name) is thought to have adopted her stage name
as a tribute to the actress Sarah Bernhardt. Her fans, mostly students and
artists living in the Latin quarter of Paris ,
called her Sarah Larousse – ‘the redhead’. ‘Sarah was fair, and her figure,
small bosomed, had the creamy unity of a Titian’, wrote the English painter
William Rothenstein. The author W.C. Morrow was also in raptures: ‘She was the
mistress of one great painter after another, and she lived and reigned like a
queen. Impulsive, headstrong, passionate, she would do the most reckless
things. But no one could resist Sarah.’ And the American artist Robert Henri
called her ‘one of the most notorious women in Paris .’
Her
exploits were legendary: she asked for an audience with the poet Paul Verlaine
only to faint in shock at the sight of his ‘terrifying’ face; she fell in love
with a black model called Bamboulo, who claimed he could eat a whole rabbit
alive, fur, bones and all; she liked to flounce out of the studio before the
artist had finished his masterpiece; she changed her costumes at will and
deliberately knocked down the painters’ easels for kicks; she was the model for
Jules Joseph Lefebvre’s Lady Godiva and Clemence Isaure, and Georges
Rochegrosse’s Les derniers jours de Babylone.
Lady Godiva |
But
Sarah Brown was most famous for appearing ‘nude’ at the Moulin Rouge for the
‘Bal des Quat’z-Arts’ in February 1893. It has been called ‘the world’s first
striptease.’ Descriptions of her costume vary – either she was completely
naked, reclining upon a shield carried by men clad only in white loincloths, or
she was wearing a black velour g-string, stockings and a black shirt. Or
perhaps she was dressed only in ‘a few rows of pearls and gold nets’.
Word
soon reached the local moral guardian, Senator Rene Berenger, who insisted on
prosecuting Sarah Brown, as well as three other models, for outraging public
decency. They told the court that they saw no difference between their
performance and posing for artists in their studios. Sarah Brown claimed she
was wearing the same Cleopatra costume she wore for Rochegrosse a few years
earlier. The verdict was predictable: guilty. She was fined 100 Francs or six
months in prison.
A
few hours later her student fans marched through Paris in protest – as many as 2,000 of them
all wearing a symbolic fig leaf on their hats. The demonstration began
peacefully but ended with street battles with the police and four days of
riots. In some ways it was a mini-revolution against the bourgeois culture
which preferred its women to stay at home, fully clothed, nursing children and
keeping house.
Sarah
Brown was only 24 years old, but this would be the high point of her career. She is said to have
lost her looks and her lovers as her wild life took its toll. Three years later
on 12 February 1896 the Daily News in London
reported her death from consumption (tuberculosis):
‘Sarah
Brown was once before the courts and everybody wondered at the reputation she
won in the studios for in a bonnet and ladylike clothing she looked commonplace
and indeed vulgar. Models generally are well-behaved girls and many live like
anchorites for fear of spoiling their plastic beauty and losing the power to
exact high fees. But Sarah Brown, who was a red haired Jewess, lived the life
of a bacchante.’
The
New York Times’ tribute - ‘The Sad Career of Sarah Brown’ - claimed she was
‘one of the scarce artist’s models who may pose for the head as well as for the
body.’ Sarah was ‘not extremely beautiful, but she knew how to seem to be
thus.’ The paper also related a story of how Sarah’s career as a model
deteriorated after she was stabbed in the breast by an English Countess vying for
the affections of the artist Rochegrosse.
Attempting
to unravel her true story would take a whole book (and she certainly deserves
one), but the question remains: does that photograph show the real Sarah Brown?
Comparing it with the paintings and another photograph suggests it might be an
imposter, someone attempting to recreate a famous image.
Although they appear almost
identical at first glance, the first woman seems a little too ordinary to be
‘the most famous model in Paris ’.
Her costume looks a little cheap, her face bears a bit too much of a
resemblance to Oscar Wilde and her pose seems slightly too awkward and heavy.
Looking closely, what appears to be naked flesh actually looks more like some
kind of long john. By contrast the second woman has the aloof, regal air of
someone who knows what they are doing. There is even the hint of an exposed
left nipple.
But whatever the truth,
don’t let that spoil your enjoyment of the real Sarah Brown – the flame-haired
woman who helped drag the stuffy, old 19th century kicking and screaming into
the modern era.
Peter
Stubley is part journalist and part author. He can be followed on Twitter @historyhack
and you can read his brilliantly researched blog which covers all manner of historical eras at http://historyhackblog.wordpress.com/
What a beautiful woman - at first she does come across as ordinary, but then you realise how captivating she was. I wonder if she was the muse for Baz Luhrmann's lead in 'Moulin Rouge'. She died so young. Rest in peace, Marie Royer.
ReplyDeleteNice tribute. A better version of the last photograph can be found on Gallica: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b53279448s
ReplyDelete